(latest update: April 15, 2014)

One of the things that homosexuals most lie about is how much harm and violence they do in society.

LGBTs perpetrate millions of acts of harm and violence in society, constantly, mostly with impunity.

Problems include: destruction of marriage, trafficking, prostitution, promiscuity, sexual harassment, abuse, molestation, murder, assault, battering, bullying, fake hate crimes, porn, degradation of human sexuality, attack on social conservatives in all spheres of life (professional, political, personal, business), trampling on fundamental rights (speech, religion, conscience), character assassination, persecution, discrimination, spreading of STDs, S&M, violation of children’s rights to heterosexual parents, and censorship of research and debate.

There are countless victims – many people, either purposefully or because of their privileged and misinformed environment are not aware of them. That is a shame because they end up persecuting good people, while empowering countless LGBTs to constantly do harm and violence in society.

Which is the group that most perpetrates violence against LGBT individuals?

LGBT individuals themselves. The number of social conservatives who perpetrate violence against LGBT people is quite small comparatively.

“Although accurate data is difficult to obtain, trends suggest that as many as half of lesbian relationships experience some form of abuse (Brand & Kidd, 1986; Nadoff, 1987; Renzetti, 1992, 1996; Taylor& Chandler , 1995). Greenwood et al. (2002) reported on a sample of 2,881 male cohabitants during the past five years and found a higher rate of violence than in cases of heterosexual relationships. Letellier (1994) found that gay men are more likely to be killed by their partners than a stranger.”

http://drgehart.com/page3/page5/files/Peterson%20GLBT%20DV.pdf

http://www.rit.edu/cla/criminaljustice/sites/rit.edu.cla.criminaljustice/files/docs/WorkingPapers/2009/2009-16.pdf

http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nb2h5bg#page-1

=============================

Paper released by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) entitled, “Associations between Intimate Partner Violence and Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” [1]

In the paper, the authors state: “Men can be subjected to IPV (Intimate partner violence) either by a female partner or by a male partner in the case of men who have sex with men (MSM, a term that encompasses homosexual, bisexual, and transgender men, and heterosexual men who sometimes have sex with men). Recent reviews suggest that the prevalence of IPV in same-sex couples is as high as the prevalence of IPV for women in opposite-sex relationships: reported lifetime prevalences of IPV in homosexual male relationships range between 15.4% and 51%.”

Additionally, Houbrick quotes an article appearing in the November 5th, 2013 edition of The Atlantic [2]. Titled, “A Same-Sex Domestic Violence Epidemic Is Silent,” this excerpt gives credence to Houbrick’s claim:

“According to the U.S. Department of Justice [3], in 2013, 15% of all domestic abuse occurred toward men by their significant others,” Houbrick notes. “The DOJ’s latest statistics reveal that, on average, 3 females and 1 male are murdered by a partner each day.”

“As acceptance of male-to-male and female-to-female marriages continue to rise, so will the amount of cases of same sex abuse,” Houbrick believes. “Liken it to a new shut closet for both sexes. A crime which goes mostly unreported because of the stigma attached.”

“Men and boys are shamed into not speaking-out concerning domestic abuse to law enforcement. Only 25% of domestic crimes are reported to police,” Houbrick refers again to the Department of Justice report released on June 28, 2013.

=========================

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM

The number of studies designed to measure domestic violence in the LGBT community pale in comparison to their heterosexual counterparts. However, studies indicate the prevalence to be equal between the LGBT community and the heterosexual community. Results from the National Violence Against Women survey indicated that gay males are more at risk than a gay females. Approximately 23% of gay males studied reported to having been raped, physically assaulted, and / or stalked by another gay male. Slightly more than 11% of gay females also reported the same circumstances. With a victimization rate of approximately 10 to 25 percent, the statistics for either being abused or knowing someone who has been abused is alarming.

=========================

Nearly 1 in 6 adults in California, about 3.7 million persons, report experiencing physical intimate partner violence (IPV) as adults.

Based on the CHIS 2007 IPV module, women (21.1%) are twice as likely to be victims of physical violence as men (11%), and eight times (8%) as likely to report being the victim of sexual violence compared to men (1%).

Bisexual (40.6%), gay, lesbian or homosexual adults (27.9%) are almost twice as likely to experience IPV as heterosexual adults (16.7%).

CHIS 2007 completed interviews with 51,048 adults. For the adult survey, an adult was randomly selected from every household. For this policy brief, we analyzed data from 37,330 adults ages 18–65 years.

==================================

I thought it was interesting to see that the rates for male victims was half as much as for women, that’s a lot of violence against men. (Unfortunately I did not see any related data on the sex of the aggressor). However, there are other studies that show something very interesting: a significant percentage of the women who have had relationships with both sexes started out having heterosexual relationships. Then they suffered violence. Then they turned to women. Isn’t it quite reasonable to assume the experience of violence they had with a man impacted their psychology to deform it towards wanting to be with a woman as perhaps what they would think is a non-violent partner? (I’m not saying we must assume this without investigation, but the statistical percentage of “bisexual” women having experienced violence from a man and then going onto to pursue homosexual relationships is huge).

If we apply these IPV percentages to the entire LGB population of the US, we get at the very least about one million violent homosexuals/bisexuals, doing violence to other LGBs.

Compare it with a typical annual “hate” crime number:

“2,503 hate and bias incidents against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or HIV-affected (LGBTQH)”

One million violent, disgusting homosexuals doing violence to LGBs compared to 2,500 cases of “bias incidents” where we don’t know the profile of the perpetrator. One million versus 2,500.

The group of people that is extremely violent to LGBs is none other than LGBs themselves.

Who is spreading propaganda to cover up how violent and perverted LGBTs are? LGBTs and their liberal supporters.

And that’s not examining all the violence and harm that LGBTs do to heterosexuals, both children and adults (sexual harassment problems, molestation, abuse, spreading STDs, denigrating sexuality with porn, etc.).

When a socially conservative heterosexual bullies an LGBT individual, all social conservatives are accused of being bullies and haters in their hearts – not because of this individual acting alone – but  because they do not normalize homosexuality. But when a LGBT individual bullies, batters, rapes, or exploits another LGBT individual, they are never called out for being a hater, not even a bigot- and certainly not as a hateful identity group.

Where is anyone complaining about how violent LGBT people are? The only complaint I see in the media/society is about some “redneck” profile, who is violent only at times.

But, in reality, if we look at statistics, LGBT people are much more violent to LGBT people than any “redneck.”

So who is backwards and uncivilized, or full of hate? Why are liberals at liberty to call conservatives such derogatory labels, when reality clearly shows that LGBT individuals are violent, perverted, and gross in millions of cases?

………………………………..

What is the group that most sexually exploits and traffics LGBT youngsters? LGBT individuals themselves. It would be hard to find a social conservative who does this.

………………………………..

Which is the group that most spreads HIV and syphilis in society (US)?

Men who have sex with men – that is the LGBT population.

This means they are criminally responsible for transmitting deadly diseases in large numbers, and in much greater proportions than any other group. But they currently have total impunity to be so destructive and perverted.

That is not only self-destructive, but socially destructive as well.

“Trend data released today in CDC’s 2011 STD Surveillance Report show that primary and secondary syphilis rates are increasing among gay and bisexual men, who now account for more than 70% of all infections.

During the 1990s, syphilis primarily occurred among heterosexual men and women of racial and ethnic minority groups. However, the tide shifted and cases began to increase among gay and bisexual men, referred to as men who have sex with men (MSM) in CDC data systems. -

See more at: http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.aids.gov%2F2012%2F12%2Fsyphilis-and-hiv-a-dangerous-duo-affecting-gay-and-bisexual-men.html&ei=sOrGUrqNO6OR0AX094HwDA&usg=AFQjCNGefaChuotDeCzPu9m_MAtjsiER6A&bvm=bv.58187178,d.d2k

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM))a represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young MSM (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all MSM. At the end of 2010, an estimated 489,121 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the United States were MSM or MSM-IDU.

http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fhiv%2Frisk%2Fgender%2Fmsm%2Ffacts%2F&ei=7erGUu7ZCsOg0wXs-YHIAg&usg=AFQjCNGEScNLGdfgbxRTcP-Q6-voVNeu0Q&bvm=bv.58187178,d.d2k

======================================

I would think MSM is more like 5% to 10%, not a mere 2%. Still, they lead the way in spreading these deadly diseases.

See what people do when they think homosexuality is normal?

Lastly, they then extort billions of dollars from the State in health care costs for the respective treatments, hogging resources that could otherwise go to help so many other victims that never did anything criminal or destructive, like abused children.

In other words, these people think that they are not accountable for their perverted sexual attitudes and behaviors, and that they State must pick up the tab for any destruction they cause.

………………………………..

About 10% of sexual assaults in the military were males sexually assaulting males.

You can see the report here (2011):

http://www.sapr.mil/index.php/annual-reports

This is interesting because the estimates for homosexual males in the military are about 1-2% of all military personnel. And yet homosexual male  sexual assaults were 10% of all assaults.

That is much higher than their respective representation. And with the repeal of DADT, it will only climb. However there will be tremendous pressure, and much greater pressure than before, to cover up and lie about any homosexual perpetrator, in order to prove for political reasons that repealing DADT “worked.”

…………………………..

Jason Felch, the LA Times reporter who investigated 1,600 of the Boy Scouts’ “perversion files”, reported that the files revealed a pattern of grooming behavior shared by the suspected molesters.

According to the article, “In hundreds of cases, Scout leaders allowed the boys to drive cars, drink alcohol, or look at pornography. They gradually tested physical boundaries during skinny dipping, group showers, sleepovers, and one-on-one activities.”

By spending one-on-one time with a boy, giving him gifts, and allowing him to break the rules, the abuser gains the boy’s trust and sets a tone of secrecy that will continue throughout the relationship.

To outsiders, the abuser seems like a great guy who loves kids or youngsters.

As the article also points out, after an abuser has gradually tested boundaries, they will use a boy’s inebriation from alcohol or their arousal from watching pornography as an opportunity to make their move and molest the boy or engage in other sexual activities with an adolescent.

…………………………….

What we have seen advance in the last 50 years, is quite rightly, the level of violence and harm that LGBT people do in terms of IPV, sexual harassment (to everyone), and spread of serious STDs – and this is not an exhaustive list. The increase is huge and current levels of harm and violence are terrible.

There has been an advancement in what is allowed, a measured increase in serious harm in society done by LGBT people. It is not only allowed, but allowed with almost total impunity. Yet, I would never be aware of this, by listening to people with a homosexuality agenda, who only talk about the comparatively few cases where the perpetrator is a social conservative. I believe that not only you, but everyone needs to deal with how violent and harmful LGBT people are.