Related to this post on the Rotherham scandal and Peter Tatchell, I dug up an old post that I had posted in my old blog (Blogsome) on December 18, 2010, but which never got reposted here. My comments to what is reported in the article have been interspersed within double brackets.
Britain’s Leading Gay Homosexual Pedophile Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:15 EST
LONDON, September 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – One of Britain’s leading homosexualist activists has called again for the lowering of the age of sexual consent from 16 to 14, saying that this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people.
[[What this will do is to give any child less of a chance to say he/she was exploited, coerced, manipulated or pushed along to have sex. In other words, it will always reinforce that the sexual activity was consensual, if there was no physical violence involved.]]
Peter Tatchell, founder of the group OutRage!, wrote on the website Big Think:
“Whether we like it or not, many teenagers have their first sexual experience around the ages of 14 or 15. If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.”
[[The best way to protect young people is to let them reach a more mature age so that they can make the best decisions for their lives. Only an ideology fit for a pedophile will want to encourage sexually active children from an early age. This is how homosexual pedophiles "think of children’s wellbeing."]]
“This includes empowering them with the skills, knowledge and confidence to say no to unwanted sexual advances and to report sex abusers. Compared to the blanket criminalization of sexually-active under-age youth, this empowerment strategy is a more effective way to protect young people from peer pressure and pedophiles.”
[[And now this homosexual retard called Tatchell is saying someone is actually telling children to say yes to child abusers? No one, absolutely no one, is doing that. We could, however, mention the media do it all the time–the liberal media, that is. Every time it sends messages to children that they too are sexual objects, and that they must have sex as early as possible to feel grown up, or that pornography and promiscuity are fine models for human sexuality, they tell children to abuse themselves.
Nevertheless, officially, there are educational campaigns everywhere to educate society about child abuse. Yet, it keeps on happening. Doesn’t the homo pedophile Tatchell know that children are already being taught to report abuse, but they don’t because, often enough, they are going to be accused of having wanted the sex, of having seduced the abuser, etc etc? This is exactly what he is proposing. Doesn’t the homosexual retard know that the majority of sexual abuse cases have youngsters as victims?]]
A higher age of consent actually puts young teens at greater risk of abuse by “reinforcing the idea that young people under 16 have no sexual rights,” Tatchell said.
“They signal that a young person is not capable of making a rational, moral choice about when to have sex.”
[[And that is right. Speaking on average, a 16 year-old is much more capable to make a rational, moral choice about when and in what circumstances to have sex. And an 18 year-old even more. Two years at that age makes a world of a difference.]]
“Guilt and shame about sex also increase the likelihood of molestation by encouraging the furtiveness and secrecy on which abuse thrives,” he added.
[[And so if one made the same abusive relation "legal," as he proposes, then the kids are not supposed to feel guilt and shame? Mr. Tatchell is a piece of turd who should be behind bars.]]
“Despite what the puritans and sex-haters say, underage sex is mostly consenting, safe, and fun,” Tatchell said.
[[Yet the greater number of sexual abuse cases happens to youngsters (ages below 21). Despite what all homosexual pedophiles say, there are a significant number of "underage" sexual experiences which are abusive, exploitative, overly immature, damaging, desensitizing, etc. This is not a numbers game, as this homo pedophile would like to spin it. What does a homosexual piece of turd like Mr Tatchell care about child abuse and exploitation? Absolutely nothing. The priority for society should always be to protect the most vulnerable and to shield from the worst types of experiences, such as sexual exploitation and abuse.
If a youngster is not allowed to drive or to vote in elections before they are 18, it is so for very good reasons. They are incapable of living on their own at 14 for very fundamental reasons. Young teens are very easily influenced and manipulated. No matter how well they have been brought up, they are not adults, and they are not ready to deal with a variety of adult aspects of life at that age. ]]
“If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex, per se, but because of emotional abuse within relationships and because of unsafe sex, which can pass on infections and make young girls pregnant when they are not ready for motherhood.”
[[Sex can never be taken out of the emotional context of the situation. Sex can never be taken out of the multiple power hierarchies that are present between the participants. The rates of STDs among adult homosexuals are rising enormously everywhere. If a great number of adults with a homosexual problem cannot act responsibly, what can one expect for young teens? And remember, one in four homosexual men have been involved in an abusive domestic violence relationship. That’s the slime of people who want to get their hands on 14 year old boys.
This is outrageous.
Britain is in the sewer.
Despite what homosexual pedophiles say, there are a significant number of "underage" sexual experiences which are abusive, exploitative, overly immature, damaging, desensitizing, etc. Not to mention that it is sex outside a committed, mature marriage.
But what does a homosexual pedophile like Mr Tatchell actually know about child abuse and exploitation? Absolutely nothing, unless he's perpetrated some of it himself*.
The priority for society should always be to protect its most vulnerable members and to shield them from the worst types of experiences, such as sexual exploitation and abuse, engaging in banal and demeaning sex, and unwanted pregnancies at 14.
What exactly happened in Rotherham? Exactly what I described above, down to very last detail.]]
*In 1997, Tatchell wrote a letter to the Guardian, where he defended an academic book about Adult ‘Boy-Love’ and called it courageous. He said the book documented ‘examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal’. And he concluded: ‘The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. ‘While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.’
Then, when pressed, he says he is against adults having sex with children – but it was a great joy! You see what he did there? “I’m against it people, I’m not a homosexual pedophile shit, but hey, it’s great, especially from the ages of 9 to 13.” That’s the homosexual shit that Tatchell is.