Two brilliant and so simple but still so brilliant comments by VikingLS at The American Conservative – on Hillary’s supporters:


  • VikingLS says:

    “I don’t like her. I wished Biden or Warren was running against her. They could have given her the run for her money Sanders, as an avowed socialist, could not. ”

    Sanders looks like he tied her in Iowa and is polling ahead of her in New Hampshire. He IS giving her a run for her money. The reality is that he’s too far to the left, not for the country in general, but for upper middle class Democrats who don’t want their taxes to go up.

    You all just need to admit that you prefer Clinton to Sanders because you prefer the status quo, and that Clinton, a socially moderate small government fiscal conservative IS what you want, and have always really wanted.

  • VikingLS says:

    “The lesser of the two evils. Whomever the GOP nominates is guaranteed to be more pro-Wall Street and more pro-war.”

    This really isn’t very likely. Despite the shrieking about Cruz wanting to carpet bomb ISIS Clinton’s advocacy of the the Libyan war and her desire to play chicken with Russia by imposing a no-fly zone in Syria indicates that she is equally pro-war as any of the Republicans.

    Obama and Bill Clinton always got support from the majority of Democrats for their wars, so there will be no opposition to her military adventurism. Ultimately it will be “well she must know what she’s doing, she’s one of us after all”

    You all just need to admit that winning the culture war is more important to you than wars that mostly kill foreigners and maybe some working class kids who went into the army to pay for college.


    What I saw clearly sometime ago: Democrats are major neocons, while never admitting it – and they always justify their evil and morally bankrupt “neoconnery” by saying the Republicans are worse. How could anyone hold them accountable, they ask?

    It’s no wonder the LGBT mafia has endorsed Hillary. She is the union of military and sexual perverts.


    This was also a nice one:

    PAUL MORELLI 6 hours ago

    At this point, what difference does it make..or something like that. She will say anything to get elected and she is a horrible candidate. Not just because she is a phony, corrupt, immoral (ask Vince Foster in your next life) and a “congenital liar”, but she is really bad on the stump. Who else would be having such a difficult time with a SOCIALIST?


    :-) Indeed.

    MJR says:
    February 4, 2016 at 7:47 pm

    From an outsider’s perspective it looks like the Democrats have their own “What’s the matter with Kansas” issue. They don’t seem to be bothered by Clinton being a oligarch and Wall Street enabler, as long as she toes the line on identity politics. While Wall Street has endured an a tsunami of criticism from the left, I rarely hear the cartel in Silicon Valley criticized, except on the sacred issue of “diversity”.

    The left is okay with oligarchy as long as it’s socially liberal, and the mainstream right seems to consider oligarchy the natural outcome of the Market(peace be upon it). There are simply no mainstream options that offer resistance.


    Alan Veenstra said about her Wall Street (bribery) fees:

    $675K is pocket change.   Let’s look at the $1BILLION in the Clinton Crime Family’s foundation.

    Who gave how much.  How much came from foreign nationals while Hildebeast was letting Benghazi calls go to voice mail.


    And lastly, did you see this?

    The chart above plots the popularity of the baby name “Hillary” between 1970 and 2014. What you’ll notice right away is that the frequency of the name falls of a cliff starting in 1993, the year Hillary Clinton became first lady.

    Francis Smart of the Econometrics by Simulation blog first pointed this out the other day. He notes that the drop is especially striking, given that the popularity of “Hillary” was rising sharply upward until 1992 or so, the year the Clintons first came on to the national stage.

    The woman is a curse.

    How’s being a scumbag of a woman worked out for ya, Hillary? Did the money you looted and politically prostituted yourself for compensate the trash that you’ve become?





Recently I sat with a group of four young people ranging from 18 to 20 somethings, who were all varied degrees of liberal and have a reasonably nice middle-class life. As we chatted about different subjects, at one point I asked them: Is there a topic or issue in society that you are very concerned about?

Except for the 18 year old, the others were all thrown off with the question – it’s like they have never been asked to be concerned about anything. Concerned about something? Is there anything we should be concerned about? Like in the world, are there things to be concerned about besides ourselves?

They were at a loss, thinking about the question, not knowing what to say, maybe realizing at that moment that maybe they should be concerned about something, but what? One young woman looked slightly embarrassed. One young man made a little joke about being concerned about something totally superficial. He certainly wasn’t bothered about not being concerned about anything serious.

They searched for a few moments for something and came up with nothing. The 18 year old, who unlike the others, has not yet gone to college, but who was very interested in many issues, said what her concern was. She was the only one.

The European Immigration Crisis

Europe’s Waning Welcome

Below is a brilliant sentence. One sentence that perfectly summarizes the US today (a comment made at The American Conservative site):

Tis rather a case of a divided house living by the sum of its fears.

Fear – the great uniting force of Americans. Every horrendous policy, every mass murder, every type of exploitation, assassination, usurpation, surveillance, and torture is and will continue to be justified by mechanisms of fear at its deepest level and with material wealth as its most persuasive element. After fear, in second place comes greed.

The American system is crumbling right before the eyes of all. But most Americans, drenched in their ideological propaganda that their system is good, cannot fathom where the problem lies. Not only do they believe their system is good, but they believe it is the best and it works and therefore, by ideological diktat, it cannot malfunction. As a result, they cannot recognize that the problem lies with the very type of savage capitalism/imperialism they have. And now, additionally, this atrocious imperialist capitalism encompasses a deep layer of complete lack of morality and ethics to regulate the personal/sexuality sphere.

Add to this the two very corrupt parties that dominate the political scene – which offer no real alternative to change the system where it needs to be changed. Thus Americans having been going from populist to populist politician as their choice of president, dreaming and clamoring for hope and change, while blindly marching forward and steeping downward to greater and greater systemic malaises.

As I realized not too long ago, Hitler died, but his ideology won in the West. It brought prosperity to some – and given that the prosperity was significant in the US and Europe in the last century – it worked to camouflage a large part of the systemic rot that can never function in this type of system, along with all the people who get crushed by it along the way. Smarter Americans have realized that simply changing presidents won’t change much in the country, no matter if it’s a Democrat or a Republican administration that takes over. Yet, even these people will do very little to bring about change.

Democracy cannot function without ethics. Once you have a rotten democracy in place, such as what has happened in many Western countries, you cannot change that without enormous work from a lot of people. Americans, like most people, are stuck in their ways, their dysfunctional ideology, their attitudes, their blindness, their corruption. With each passing day, certain very valuable attitudes that they possessed, cherished, and encouraged are simply lost as part of the country’s culture. There are no more Mr. Smiths going to Washington today. Nor would they be admired if they existed. Americans traded in I Love Lucy, Jimmy Stewart, An Affair to Remember, and The Partridge Family for Grindr, Tinder, porn, and Caitlyn Jenner. It is sad – and it further underscores just how much the past is often another country.

Instead of fighting the Nazis, Americans now go murder masses of the poorest of the poor in the Middle East and Africa. Or they supply the arms and oversight for other client monsters to do the job. Or they bomb entire countries to pieces with not a thought for the suffering and destruction they inflict on defenseless populations who cannot escape.

And most of the American population supports this. They have as much concern for other people as the Germans did while gazing at the boarded trains taking those unfortunate Jews to their extermination. The threat from Stalin during “Cold War I” gave Americans the justification to commit any barbarity under the guise of fighting the particularly monstrous version of totalitarian communism that Stalin’s USSR represented. Once that fight largely disappeared, American barbarity increasingly came to the fore, naked. So new excuses needed to be created to canvass popular support. Little irrelevant groups conveniently labeled “terrorists” were presented, through a flick of a wand, to the American people as the threat that replaced the USSR communist bogeyman and who were seeking to destroy their glorious system, their way of life, their freedom – even their very lives.  And here is where this circus takes on a surreal turn. While Americans will continue to scapegoat their problems on “terrorists” and “illegal immigrants” – no matter how much they murder and bomb other peoples, and no matter how much of a militarized, police state they become, with encircling walls  set up along every inch of every border, they cannot stop the gradual implosion of their system, because it is there where the rot lies.

And another nice comment below left on TAC by Cosimano, that nicely finishes my own commentary above:

American ethics have always been subjective. Other than a sort of general agreement that it was not good to steal or murder everything else has always been open for discussion.

Religion was a nice veneer but it never really mattered all that much. People made up their minds and then found the appropriate Bible verse to support them. Not the other way around.


Some of these dolls are so realistic that they are creepy – not because of the realism, but because the artist has chosen to give them such a haunted expression – it’s awful.

Not all of them have this horrible expression, and I hope that in the future he might opt for less dreary faces overall. Most of them look like they have just been told they are going to die. Icky.

Beautiful craftsmanship in any case! Mikhail Zaykov is the Russian artist’s name.


The Telegraph reports:

Between 2010 and 2014, diagnoses of gonorrhea have more than doubled, while new cases of syphilis rose 63 per cent across England. The rise has been driven in part by a large increase of infections among gay men, according to data released by Public Health England (PHE). New cases of gonorrhea among homossexuals have tripled in four years, rising from 4,938 cases in 2010 to 18,029 in 2014.


Pigs are like that.


Cases of gonorrhea and syphilis diagnosed in England – everyone
Gonorrhea Syphilis
2010 16843 2647
2011 21090 2927
2012 25576 2959
2013 29419 3236
2014 34958 4317

Over half of diagnoses for heterossexuals in 2014 was seen among the under 25 group.You know, the liberal crowd that thinks that homosexuality is normal.

In 2014 alone there were almost 440,000 new cases of STIs reported in England. In September, an outbreak of 14 drug-resistant gonorrhoea infections in Leeds raised a national alert. 

Dr Gwenda Hughes, PHE’s head of STI surveillance, said: “We are particularly concerned about the large rises in diagnoses among gay men. Gonorrhoea in particular is becoming harder to treat as new antibiotic resistant strains emerge.”

A surge in syphilis transmissions among homossexuals is also leading to concern. Infections more than doubled among gay men in almost every age group between 2010 and 2014, jumping from 1,618 to 3,477 new cases per year. Increasing levels of testing partly explains the hike, but ongoing high levels of unsafe sex also impacted the numbers, according to PHE.

Oh my, how surprising. Thinking and behaving like a sexuality pig has consequences!

I also found this table interesting – look at gonorrhea and the lesbian and bisexual women:

The percentage change in infections between 2010 and 2014
Gonorrhea Syphilis
Heterosexual men 45.7 1.7
Heterossexual women 77.8 -6.2
Gay and bissexual men 265.1 114.9
Gay and bissexual women 141.7 -33.3


Don’t read below if you don’t want spoilers.

The energy, the pulse, the  lovers being torn apart, and then, at the very end, coming together for the final. Loved it, loved it, loved it. I also thought the three main characters were perfectly cast. And I also loved the music.

There is one funny detail about the music. There are a couple of times when we see these classic overhead shots, from the top of a building looking down on the streets of busy Manhattan, with the pedestrians and cars appearing small, and the music is really intense to convey big city hustle and bustle, but, if you look  closely, the cars are moving quite slowly due to the traffic! :-)

And I looked up the writer, and he was one of the writers blacklisted in the McCarthy era. But he got to live to 88, that’s nice.

wiki: Abraham Lincoln Polonsky (December 5, 1910 – October 26, 1999) was an American film director, Academy-Award-nominated screenwriter, essayist and novelist, blacklisted by the Hollywood movie studios in the 1950s, in the midst of the McCarthy era.


Polonsky wrote essays, radio scripts and several novels before beginning his career in Hollywood. His first novel, The Goose is Cooked, written with Mitchell A. Wilson under the singular pseudonym of Emmett Hogarth, was published in 1940.

A committed Marxist, in the late 1930s Polonsky also joined the Communist Party of the USA. He participated in union politics and established and edited a left-wing newspaper, The Home Front.

Polonsky signed a screenwriter’s contract with Paramount Pictures before leaving the US to serve in Europe in the Office of Strategic Services during World War II (from 1943 to 1945). After the war, he briefly returned to writing for Paramount. He wrote the screenplay for Robert Rossen’s independent production Body and Soul, (1947) starring John Garfield and Lilli Palmer. The screenplay was nominated for an Academy Award. Afterward, Polonsky became a Hollywood film director.

Polonsky’s first film as a director, Force of Evil (1948), was not successful when released in the United States, but it was hailed as a masterpiece by film critics in England. The film, based on the novel Tucker’s People by Ira Wolfert, has since become recognized as one of the great American films noirs and, in 1994, was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.”

Hollywood blacklist

Polonsky’s career as a director and credited writer came to an abrupt halt after he refused to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in 1951. Illinois congressman Harold Velde called the director a “very dangerous citizen” at the hearings. While blacklisted, Polonsky continued to write film scripts under various pseudonyms that have never been revealed. It is known that Polonsky, along with Nelson Gidding, co-wrote Odds Against Tomorrow (1959), in which Polonsky’s name was initially dropped from the film credits. Polonsky was not given public credit for the screenplay until 1997, when the Writers Guild of America, west officially restored his name to the film under the WGA screenwriting credit system.

Later life

In 1968, Polonsky was the screenwriter for Madigan, a police noir, and Polonsky used his own name in the credits. The film was directed by Don Siegel, starring Richard Widmark and Henry Fonda.

After a prolonged absence, Polonsky returned to directing in 1969 with the Western film Tell Them Willie Boy Is Here, a tale of a fugitive Native American pursued by a posse, which Polonsky converted into an allegory about racism, genocide, and persecution.

Polonsky was an uncredited scriptwriter for Mommie Dearest[2] (1981), based on Christina Crawford‘s memoirs of her adoptive mother Joan Crawford, and The Man Who Lived at the Ritz (1981), based a novel by A.E. Hotchner. A Marxist until his death, Polonsky publicly objected when director Irwin Winkler rewrote his script for 1991’s Guilty by Suspicion, a film about the Hollywood blacklist era, by revising the lead character (Robert De Niro) into a liberal, rather than a Communist.

He received the Career Achievement Award of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association in 1999. Prior to that, Polonsky taught a philosophy class at USC School of Cinema-Television called “Consciousness and Content”. While no longer a member of the Communist Party, he remained committed to Marxist political theory, stating “I thought Marxism offered the best analysis of history, and I still believe that”.

Until his death, Polonsky was a virulent critic of director Elia Kazan, who had testified before HUAC and provided names to the Committee. In 1999, he was enraged when Kazan was honored by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for lifetime achievement, stating that he hoped Kazan would be shot onstage: “It would no doubt be a thrill in an otherwise dull evening”. Polonsky also said that his latest project was designing a movable headstone: “That way if they bury that man in the same cemetery, they can move me.”[3]

Thom Andersen interviewed Polonsky in the 1990s about the events of the Hollywood Ten years for his film Red Hollywood.

Polonsky died on October 26, 1999, in Beverly Hills, California, aged 88.

The movie is free on youtube:

Started yesterday and finished today watching this movie, it is the cutest thing ever.

(wiki:) A Night to Remember is a mystery comedy film starring Loretta Young and Brian Aherne. It was directed by Richard Wallace, and is based on the novel The Frightened Stiff by Kelley Roos. A mystery writer and his wife try to solve a murder when a corpse appears in their Gay Street apartment. (Obviously now the name of the street has been ruined by the pervs of our world).

Simply adorable script, but it wouldn’t have worked unless  it was acted out by two very charming and full of personality actors, which is what Young and Aherne are. I also greatly enjoyed how she constantly and  matter-of-factly manages her husband without being bossy, in a very loving way. They are so adorable together. It’s like they are the perfect couple.

After I watched the film I also thought about how this is a really low budget film (if you don’t count the star salaries – just actual production elements like location/set/filming), and yet it yields such a great result. So much more enjoyable than most of the big budget movies I watch every now and then today. Of course, I got completely lost on the the plot. I didn’t understand all those tenants in the building were being blackmailed, I thought they were some kind of gang hiding from the police…

Another reflection I had was that while Americans were producing and watching such light and fun movies, the world was moving into a particular horrific world war. Alas, nothing has changed.

Free on youtube –


Spoilers, spoilers.

Yesterday I watched the entire BBC mini-series of Scarlet and Black*, based on Stendhal’s classic, another classic that I had no idea what it was about. I was expecting something quite boring, like the kind of show where you expect to watch 15-30 minutes and give up on it because it’s so boring. I was gifted with a very nice surprise!

The series, the story, and the acting are quite strong and engaging, and often witty, the pace is energetic, and the Napoleon device/dialogue is perhaps the most clever element of  it all! Very sharp political and social criticisms as well.  All around it was quite engaging. And there is lots of material to think about patriarchy, which was interesting :-). I also greatly enjoyed  how different the characters are from each other. And they are so representative of that society! Not an easy world – just like ours.

It’s only at the end that it goes all 1830s on you and then it’s ridiculous. I kept waiting for that last twist but, alas, it doesn’t happen. Not that I had great expectations, but still, I thought there was a small chance. When he basically decides to kill himself – and what a great political speech, by the way -, I thought oh, here we go, they’re all going to kill themselves now. I bet she (the older woman) is going to throw herself off that cliff near her mansion. I was close.

And also, it didn’t make much sense to me why she would be so crazy about him, even long afterwards. Her psychology didn’t seem to be that unstrung. Then again the novel was written by a man, no?

I usually have low expectations for these famous writers because I often find their novels so passé and boring and not something I can relate to, especially from a psychological level. But here I found the opposite.

*from wiki:

Scarlet and Black is a British four-part television drama series first aired in 1993 by the BBC with a cast including Ewan McGregor and Rachel Weisz. The series was adapted by Stephen Lowe from the novel The Red and the Black (1830) by French writer Stendhal. The story follows an ambitious, but impoverished young man, who seduces women of high social standing in order to improve his prospects; an Icarus of the post-Napoleonic era.

Spoilers, spoilers.

Yesterday I saw the weirdest made-for-TV movie ever: 39 Nine Steps (BBC, 2008 – free on youtube), written by a Lizzie Mickery. I had first read it was a spy thriller set before WWI.

OK, let’s give it a try. It starts with a pretty intense running away scene. It’s the classic Grisham plot (although he’s not the author): the innocent dashing hero, Richard Hannay, is at the scene of the murder of a spy and  is therefore believed to be the murderer, so  he runs for his life from the police and the real murderers, and must be clever at every turn as he decides to solve the crime by himself. This is going to be a fast-paced movie, with lots of suspense and danger, I thought.

Well, it was all very nice, with a million twists and turns, except the movie very quickly turns into a complete farce fit for 11 year olds, in the sense that the hero (and his quickly added woman companion) start getting away from completely impossible situations again and again and again.

My brain first started going, “Wait a second… What just happened here? This simply would not have been possible.” But then you’re like, “OK, maybe it could have happened, like one in a million chances, he made it somehow.” The second part of your brain then starts trying to convince the first part of the opposite. And the first part of your brain is still thinking rationally, “No, no, listen, this would not have been possible.” The second part of your brain insists,  “It has to be possible, because he just did it.” “No way.” “It  happened, you saw it”. And you get this uneasy feeling of being told authoritatively that 2+2 is somehow 5.

As you sort of re-classify the first impossible incident as maybe somehow somewhere, who knows,  two minutes later… “Wait a second. What did this guy just do now? That’s impossible!” Then two minutes later…

Then you realize you’ve been had by the description of this movie as a “spy thriller” – read realistic. And the ridiculous “photographic memory” thing. Jeez.

The movie  has a really fun romance, though, following the spy story. But then it  even twists the romance  ridiculously  at the very end. The end where she is shot and falls into the lake was one of the most horrible endings I have ever seen. Why? Because the movie is such  light, entertaining farce. It’s not the kind of movie that the woman hero would die tragically at the end, after the lovers finally admitted their love, etc. etc. It felt like I had been kicked. What awful writing.

And then, the most stupid scene ever happens. The movie tells you: Oh wait, she didn’t really drown after being shot and falling into a lake with the hero diving after her and not even seeing her body – meaning it had sunk real deep, beyond reach. Somehow she got away swimming after being shot and under water without oxygen for 30 minutes.

Awful. How does such a bad ending get approved by a whole chain of executives? I don’t understand it.

But I thought Rupert Penry-Jones was a great choice for the hero character. Handsome and athletic and dashing and sensitive and all.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers